Risk Comparison of Landmine Detection
Methods
Summary
The United Nations has specified a mine clearance standard of 99.6%
for humanitarian demining. Currently the only way to achieve this
is with manual demining methods. Although we present the breadth
of available detection methods below, only the Greatcore remote
detector, conventional manual landmine detector and remote unmanned
vehicles can possibly meet or exceed this standard. The advantages
of the Greatcore GDM1 method are analyzed below.
| Methods |
Risk Profile |
| Greatcore GDM1 remote landmine detector |
- Detection from up to 30 feet - no injury risk during detection.
- Can detect landmines with low metal content, resulting in
higher success. |
| Metal manual landmine detector |
- Close proximity to landmines.
- False positives of 1000 for every 1 landmine.
- Low success with landmines of low metal content. |
| Use of animals for mine detection |
- Time and investment taken to train these animals.
- Indeterminate false positives.
- Lacking compliance with U.N. standards for humanitarian
demining. |
| Use of plants for landmine detection |
- Still experimental with indeterminate false positives.
- Issues of ecological control of a new genetically engineered
specie.
- Question of meeting U.N. standards for humanitarian demining. |
| Bacteria for landmine detection |
- Certain explosive chemicals are yet undetectible.
- Question of meeting U.N. standards for humanitarian demining. |
| Nuclear detection |
- Still theoretical. |
| Unmanned landmine detection vehicles |
- Relatively high cost operations.
- Logistics of transporting and servicing these vehicles. |
Descriptions of other landmine detection methods
Manual detection with metal landmine detector
The typical first step in manual demining is to scan the area with
metal detectors, which are sensitive enough to pick up most mines
but which also yield about one thousand false positives for every
mine, and cannot detect landmines with very low metal content. Areas
where metal is detected are carefully probed at close proximity
to determine if a mine is present, and must continue until the object
that set off the metal detector is found. Technologies that improve
safety include large, pillow-like pads strapped to the bottoms of
shoes that distribute weight and dull the impact of footsteps, as
very slight disturbances of the ground can tip off old, unstable,
or intentionally sensitive mine triggers. Safety requires that procedures
are followed rigorously. Only one out of 1,000 detections by this
method turns out to be landmines. The rest are either metal fragments
or ground minerals.
Other manual landmine detection methods
These typical methods are not amenable to zero risk tolerance for
human injuries.
Use of animals for mine detection
- Dogs
Several countries have trained dogs to smell explosive chemicals
like TNT in landmines.
- Rodents
Specifically, Gambian giant poached rats have been trained to smell
landmines, and yet are small and light enough not to set them off.
Further experiments hace also guided certain rats into virtually
unreachable areas by using electrode to guide them.
- Marine mammals
Sea lions and dolphins are known to have been trained by The U.S.
Navy Marine Mammal Program to detect seamines.
Use of Plants for landmine detection
Landmines release nitrous oxide that turn these plants turn red.
The best studied is the specie mustard Arabidopsis thaliana which
has been genetically manipulated for this purpose. However, nitrous
oxide can also be released by denitrifying bacteria, resulting in
the risk of false positives. Researchers are addressing this problem
by making the plant less sensitive. In theory , these plants could
either be sown from aircraft or by people walking through demined
corridors in minefields. No studies have yet been conducted with
actual landmines, though successful studies have been done in greenhouse
environment.
Note: In September 2008, the Danish firm, Aresa Biodetection
that had been primarily behind the research and promotion of this
methodology announced that it had discontinued the work behind this
project.
Use of Bacteria for landmine detection
Scientists have genetically engineered a strain of bacteria to
fluoresce under ultraviolet light in the presence of TNT. In tests,
the bacteria successfully detected mines when sprayed over simulated
minefields. successfully located mines. This method has been found
to produce relatively quick results, and could be used over different
terrain. Even small amounts of TNT are detected but there are some
false positives near plants and water drainage. However, Unfortunately,
no strain of bacteria is capable of detecting RDX, another common
explosive. They also may not be visible under desert conditions.
Newly-laid and well-engineered mines may escape detection under
this method due to insufficient corrosion.
Nuclear detection for landmine detection
The concept of detecting explosives through elemental analysis
by neutrons to detect nitrogen has been proposed. Majority of explosives
are nitrogen rich. The focus has mainly been directed at airport
security and hostile trucks although its use for landmine detection
has been suggested.
Landmine sensing vehicles for detection

Landmine detection vehicle
|

Low cost robot
|
Various types of unmanned vehicles have been considered for landmine
detection and clearance on the premise that they keep human beings
out of harm's way. The larger landmine sensing vehicles are more
appropriate for peace-keeping and military use to clear landmine-free
paths. Lower cost robotic vehicles are being developed with wider
humanitarian deployment in mind. They are programmed to move in
all directions, scanning for the existence of landmines. If any
landmine is found, the ULSV sends the information using a FM transmitter
interfaced to it. The vehicle is operated with battery power. At
the base station a mini-computer receives information about the
location and distance of the mine.
|